|
Post by max23 on Mar 29, 2022 21:43:00 GMT -5
There's lots of articles on the internet about the effect of periods on athletic performance. The interesting thing about this one is that it goes against anecdotal evidence that performance declines once an athlete's period starts. The article mentions Chinese swimmer Fu Yuanhui, who made headlines in 2016 at the Rio Olympics for telling a reporter she had not performed well due to her period starting the night before her event. According to the article, exercise scientist Kurt Vogel is conducting research with female athletes at Lions FC (the Lions play in a national competition, the Australian Football League). "Three times a week, he tests [the players'] maximal strength and maximal speed while tracking changes through the menstrual cycle. '[It's] quite interesting to see that during the period, after the first day, generally there's an improvement in performance, he said. It is prior to that where the performance tends to decrease.'" By using the words "prior to that", does he mean that a decline in performance is confined to the first day of a player's period, or is he saying it declines in the lead up to the player's period? I'd be interested to know, but unfortunately it's not really clear from the article. "Research 'gaps' about periods, the pill and female physiology affecting women in sport": www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-13/research-gaps-in-sports-science-affecting-women/100865596
|
|
|
Post by max23 on Jan 11, 2023 6:23:23 GMT -5
A research study has found that athletes who are "cycling naturally" (i.e. not taking the contraceptive pill) recover better from the stress that exercise puts on their body from day one of their period up until ovulation. The study was conducted after users of Whoop, a "fitness and health wearable" reported "green recovery scores — the highest indication that their body is ready to perform — during the first part of their cycle, including their periods". The study "analysed data on 4500 [Whoop] users (incorporating 13,535 menstrual cycles), with the findings broadly matching the anecdotal feedback they had received". Other experts think more research is needed, and with the data currently available, it's not possible to reach any conclusions about how the menstrual cycle affects athletic performance. Professor Kirsty Elliott-Sale from Manchester Metropolitan University in the UK said "There is so much variation, not just between women, but individual women can experience variability too. So a woman might have a 27-day long cycle this time, then 30 days the next." "Elite athletes are no longer ashamed of their periods - and tracking their menstrual cycles may even be a secret weapon": www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-11/menstrual-tracking-cycle-coaching-fitness-performance/101296512
|
|